Nothing Universe Theory

Universe nothing By James Dennis Huff Introduction In this article I will discuss and logical evidence for a new theory of how the universe began. This is supported by all evidence to the Big Bang theory. This theory states that “Nothing Universe” theory. During my formative years, I learned the three most popular theories of the time. The most popular of which was and still is, the Big Bang Theory. The credit, I can not bring myself to the Big Bang Theory, there is a possibility. I do not say this lightly, I thought and followed the Big Bang theory for many years. That the Big Bang theory is holder, there is strong scientific evidence that there are points where the most plausible explanation. The question that must be considered is: “It is logical or plausible in the absence of a better theory plausible? All as the forensic evidence can sometimes suggest the wrong place, if scientific evidence. As I’m sure there are more than a few innocent men and women in prison, I am also sure that there a theory or two, which remain popular today simply because of the good research based on false conclusions. The only sticking point for me in the Big Bang theory, the “time.” What was singularity before it exploded? If it were not for that critical question, I would accept easier The Big Bang Theory, and “Nothing Universe” theory would not have existed. The theory of the oscillating universe is nice, but it provided the same problem, never had a beginning. If the universe has always existed, so there is a plausible theory. However, I find it hard to believe because something would have this endless loop in motion. This is not necessarily a true statement. I can hardly conceive of how the universe can not expand and contract constantly put in motion at some point in the past. This term refers to a start at some point in the past. The same applies to the theory of steady-state universe. The idea that the universe has always existed and always will, as it is from all eternity is a difficult thing to understand. The big problem with this theory is that we know the universe is not static. There is growing and changing on a daily basis. Some have suggested that, although built the big picture remains the same. I do not agree, the stars are born and die, colliding objects are sucked into black holes, etc. We live in a very active and constantly changing world. I’ll give you a detailed overview of the three currently accepted theories followed by “Nothing Universe” theory. I am also a brief discussion about God, because I think the argument can not be excluded… Whatever it unlikely that existence can be. I know that God is a subject that many people want is not to touch. I think, for the consideration of the origin of all things on the subject, at least be treated briefly. What I propose in this paper an idea I have seen for many years. There is a theory that I think, and helped me achieve a better understanding of our universe. I have about 15 years of testing and development of this theory. It goes beyond the breaking point of “time.” The time before the singularity or the existence of a god. In my opinion, make it only two current theories that made sense. This is the “Nothing Universe” theory, and it is the theory of God. The concept of God or suffer the “Forward” problem, but it is by design. No matter how I get my brain I have no other conclusions can rack. Either the theory is not correct, the correct theory has not been written, or God is responsible for everything. I will also explain this point. I’ll do it by developing a plausible argument that there is a God, and why it is so difficult for science to ever destroy the idea of a god. I do not really believe in one God, but the nature of God, it is virtually impossible to completely discount their existence. These are the choices I myself, and now I’m staying with my conclusions. My goal now is to share my theory with the world, and attempt to provide a complete and thorough this new theory. I think this theory will combine all the bits of life. With a good understanding of our origins, we are able to gain a complete overview on the inner workings of our reality. I would also say, “Pride of copyright”. Remember that you read this article. New ideas are accepted not easy or easier thanks to many factors. Pride of the author is simple terms, the refusal to believe a new idea or theme, if a person threatens to current workgroup or belief structure. Refusal of a new idea is based on the emotions of man, not a good way to tackle any subject. I consider my ideas simply as I looked at other ideas and works. I would also add that the earth was once flat, has been charged with fire and plate tectonics ether is an absurd notion. “Nothing Universe” theory may also seem like an absurd idea, but I do not seek to faith. I am only looking for their consideration. The Big Bang Theory The Big Bang theory was proposed by Georges Lemaitre. He formulated his theory based on observations of the structure of the universe and theoretical considerations at the time. Doppler shift was one of those comments, first measured in 1912 by Visto Slipher. He noted that galaxies receding from the Earth appeared. The result is “Doppler effect” was. As objects recede from us, different wavelengths are stretched and we as a red light. It is, as we know, our universe is expanding. Lemaitre like Shift “Doppler” and concluded in 1931 that if the universe is expanding today, it would be logical to assume that the universe was once very low. Could reverse the expansion, an atom of “primordial” obtained. This atom has come to be known by the singularity. As we have this time in the past, the current laws of physics can be excluded that go further back than we exist. If we’re as close as possible, then this singularity receive our laws of physics that was the case. When we reach this point, we reach a point where there is nothing like a singularity. At the moment, not to apply the traditional laws of physics. I think this is called the Planck era. “Upon the singularity of the consensus is that we perceive a point infinitely small and infinitely dense pure energy. Nobody can explain what inevitably, given the limitations of the singularity itself. Many people believe that nothing exists but the singularity. We can not go anywhere beyond the point of his life. We do not know where did the singularity, and we do not know if not something to him. The common view is: there was nothing before the singularity singularity was singularity immediately extended This is a very important point to consider. Many under the theory that the universe began with an explosion of support. Perhaps in the belief the past but not today. Many tend to get the “Big Bang” as a sudden expansion of the singularity and not an explosion. Imagine A Perfect Circle on a piece of paper with a diameter of 8 inches. Now imagine this circle expands outward in no time a diameter of 80 inches. This is how the universe began. The uniqueness extends to create our present universe. Since we know that the universe continues to grow today, one might assume that the Big Bang is still held today. It is also possible that the expansion of space has ceased, the dynamics of matter that is not. One might assume that the slowdown, but recent observations suggest that to accelerate the expansion and not slow down. gave the two greatest discoveries, the power, this theory is that the universe is expanding and the background radiation is present everywhere around us. This background radiation (cosmic background radiation) is assumed to be evidence of a big explosion and expansion, supporting the theory of Big Bang. Other documents were discovered, for example; abundance of single elements of the universe, namely hydrogen and helium. development and distribution of matter in our universe Not a lot from a list, but these two ideas, and the two above seem to be the most important issues to support the Big Bang theory. Much work has been done when the results are part of a Big Bang universe. This work is not directly prove the Big Bang, it has been revealed and is not in conflict with the Big Bang. For example, I want to know how an object appears on a kitchen table. In this case, the object is a glass. For example, a glass appears again in the future, I’ll wait. Finally, I note that a person enters the room and places a glass on the table. Now I know how the glass on the table. Now, suggests that it is also a popular theory that we live on a planet. The discovery of how the glass came to be where he was, has nothing to do with the theory that we live on a planet to do. Since the advent of glass that happens on this planet, it fits well with the theory that a planet, but we broke a glass to show how to have arrived at this place. We proved this hypothesis, without threatening our planet theory. This is a simplistic explanation for a topic not so simple. Consider the evidence for the theory of Big Bang. We know that much of our universe is composed of simple things, such as hydrogen and helium. The majority of our periodic table of elements consists of elements, consisting of a very small percentage of our universe. Because of more complex elements must be trained in an environment of high energy, in this case a star. The evolution of the elements of our universe would look like; Protons and electrons have combined to form hydrogen Hydrogen collected in large clouds of hydrogen Finally, these compressed hydrogen, are formed by stars fusion of hydrogen into helium in these stars , High temperatures in the stars formed a square complex elements a star dies and explodes, the elements are scattered, and new stars are born from this cloud Now we have elements, not just gas giants form, but also rocky planets This is a simplistic view, but a clear picture of how matter has evolved from its beginnings until today. The universe is about 15000000000 years old, the weather will continue like this. Especially when you consider he only took the life 3000000000 years here with us. There is only one fifth of our universe exists. The remaining four fifths in the creation of stars, death and evolution of the elements used by us to a point where the elements of a new development could make to begin. The evolution of life on Earth and perhaps other planets. The cosmic background radiation to each of us who have ever seen belongs to a radio station or watch the air out of a television station in the air. The hiss you hear on the radio is caused by background radiation, and also with the fuzz on your TV off air. It was actually a noise that could not be detected in an experiment eliminated. Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson worked for Bell Labs in 1964, when they made the discovery. They were with a horn antenna Super Sensitive radio waves to detect the echo bouncing ball were satellites. They had to withdraw from any interference, and have been largely successful. They could not seem to be overcome at a low hissing noise, no matter how hard they tried. This low level hissing noise proved to be the cosmic background radiation over the birth of our universe. This, as has been the mark of the Big Bang theory celebrated. He recalls an event which has created massive our universe. An event that incredible amounts of energy released. While this may be true, and we know of its existence, it is possible that another event could explain the background radiation. Much of the research focused on the theme of the Big Bang. Like any theory, there are some wrinkles that need to be eradicated. All theories have wrinkles and sticking points, some more than others. The Big Bang is still strong because it has fewer wrinkles than other proposed theories and assumptions. This is the evidence that has been assigned is coupled, it will remain the main theory for some time. It is not the first and will not be the last theory, which assumes to be true. Although it may be wrong. Oscillating Universe Theory Perhaps the second most widely believed theory for the beginning of our universe. It was designed by Alexander Friedman in 1922 and remains relatively intact today. The big sticking point of this theory is the assumption that we live in a closed universe. Currently, most scientists now believe that we do not live in a closed universe. I say most, “because I knew science teachers have long believed that if you are strong enough telescope you can see the back of your head would!” The easiest way, this theory is the opinion of the Big Bang happen think again and again, each time ending with a Big Crunch, followed by a big bang. expanded at some time in the past, the uniqueness of the origin of the universe. Finally, the universe began to slow, then contract. Ultimately, the universe would end in a Big Crunch, then increase again and eventually lead to a new world would end in a Big Crunch, and so on and so forth. The main reason for this theory is like the Big Bang theory is that many do not see a difference between accepting this theory and the Big Bang. Why consider the possibility that we are many worlds throughout the cycle? If we just look at the universe and its beginning and end can. The conclusion is that we do not need to focus on a pattern. We can in the first universe, or the 100th in the cycle, it does not matter. What are we interested in doing in this universe began, how old he is and how it will end. This cycle is important for us because we live in it. So how it is tempting to consider also that this universe is just one of many universes, we must stay focused on this universe. For this reason, many have chosen only to the Big Bang theory. In reality, the Big Bang theory is a subset of the oscillating universe theory. Theory of steady state This theory looks at the universe having always existed, and there always will be. The universe exists today as it did millions, billions, trillions of years. There is no beginning or end. Developed in 1948 by Fred Hoyle, Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, it has been proposed as an alternative to the Big Bang theory. He suggests that new elements are continually expanding as the creation of the universe. This with the idea that our universe is expanding, and so was new elements of the universe would need to remain relatively the same treatment. This theory could not escape observable fact. The world has changed, expanded, and there was nothing “steady-state to learn.” It was an interesting concept that its proponents had. It suffers the same questions to all theories of this kind. Is there a beginning? Even if the universe has always existed, where is everything? How can something always been if we know that our universe is dominated by the beginnings and ends? Conceptually, trying to deal with these issues. We would not consider a “before time” when there is no time limit for example. The same thing is to say in the end. You can not have, if the universe is endless. Strange, “We can not think of an infinity of departure, but not infinite, without beginning, who also has an end result.” Is it directly from our habit of thinking? This includes the three main theories for the beginning of our universe. The Big Bang is the clear leader with two others with only a minority of supporters on the left. It also publishes several other lesser known theories found with her a little research by any interested person. Universe nothing This theory is not known or accepted theory, because it is a new theory. I call it a theory but as a hypothesis, that the evidence that exists for the Big Bang theory also supports this theory. That is to say: “My theory accounts for much of what is the Big Bang theory, and some of which did not consider the Big Bang theory.” When I’m articulate enough, I will able, the strengths of this theory forward, and why it must be considered (at least) or as a running mate with the Big Bang theory. Perhaps the day will come when “Nothing Universe” theory independent, but I know how difficult it is to dethrone current and widely accepted beliefs. We all do not know our conception of man. If a bottle is empty, we say: “Nothing is in the bottle.” We know this is not really the case. What we mean that we should think about the bottle is no longer there. So, really nothing to be in a bottle, the bottle itself must contain a vacuum. A void is the total absence of matter. The only thing that can exist in a vacuum, is energy. A vacuum is the true concept of nothingness, but this is not the true form of all. “What I propose is that our concept of nothing, and the true state of nothingness are two different things.” The real status of neutrality is not. A balance between charges in a perfectly arranged atoms. The atomic perfect, I said nothing of the atom. (See Figure 1). Note that the above figure is not the exact structure of the atom is nothing. It is simply a representation of how the atom could have nothing, or have existed. The central point is to take from this figure that there was both nuclear matter and antimatter. Everyone was the destruction of the other held by neutrons and positrons with electrons occupying different orbits cloth. The provision of this atom may have been much more complex than this model I proposed. I will be explaining this in detail in a moment nuclear. It may be that there was no such particles in an atom. Nothing Universe may consist of a sea of particles and in a manner which was composed, not locked to destroy each other. Antimatter and matter separated by neutrons. I am of the opinion that the point atom does not exist and nothing in this theory. It is also important to note that this atom, the existence, structure and no substance. There is no beginning, because this atom is the real state of the universe, before the creation of the universe we know today. If I say there is nothing I want to say is that nothing existed in the atom perfect. The atom Nothing that permeates all space. In a certain sense of the universe in which we live today, the definition of something (life), while the pre-universe (Nothing universe represented) of the definition of nothing. Photo of the atoms in an arrangement that allows for as little as possible the space between them, and complete all pre-universe in all directions. Contrary to the theory of Big Bang singularity, no free energy is nothing in this universe. All power is in this sea of nothingness atoms. Thus, instead of a singularity in the expansion of space, instead we have our universe in an expanding universe. A perfect world no. Our universe contains the free energy and a ton of space and is limited by a universe without energy and no free space. The atom Nothing that exists beyond our universe is both matter and antimatter particles are linked and separated by neutrons. The atom is not composed of a proton and the neutron, the electron and its antimatter counterparts. They are all locked together and destroy each other held by neutrons. I do not know exactly the arrangement of particles in the atom perfect, but that is irrelevant. All that matters is the notion that all locked together in the atom nothing perfect. The electron and positron annihilate each other not because they occupy different orbital lobe. Again, I do not understand the specific provision of these atoms, but only that it existed. Whatever the perfect setting always, quite neutral atom Nothing is the only thing which existed in the pre-composed and infinitely perfect universe. There was no motion and no time, but we can use the concept of infinity to give us an idea of the state of the universe to the point of the event. We now have the perfect world does not consist only of the neutral atom and none perfect. All the energy is high, firm in the form of particles which make up this universe nothing blocked. Billions of dollars. on the trillions of trillions of trillions of where these atoms. An endless sea of atoms in which one can fall apart. One of these atoms destabilized in a sea of infinity, and led to the “event” and the creation of our universe. Something had to perfect in one of these atoms, they cause nothing to destabilize. Something to destabilization has been one of the particles to create the atom to a chain reaction leading to irreversible birth of the known universe. I refer to that event. The smoking gun could well be one of the same forces responsible for radioactive decay. I am one of the strengths of quantum particles refers to dictate the behavior of a sub atomic level. These are the strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force and electrostatic force. A slight change in one of these forces could lead to the destabilization of one of these atoms is nothing perfect. The result was a chain reaction that created our universe, and will continue indefinitely. Event The event is the right time, the chaos began. I came up with a theory to explain this is based on the concept of probability. Statistically, one would assume that if you have to do with infinity, the probability of an event is one in infinity. In other words, if an event can occur, for example, if unlikely, there is still a chance for his appearance at infinity is taken into account. I quote one of my former professors of geology, Dr. Eastler, because I take this quote to my concept of the event feel beautiful. He said: “He did not have to happen, but it had to happen.” In other words, it is because everything that exists, and if it does not happen, as if we were not there to make a difference. Since we can have here, it is safe to assume something is happening, and the event “were such things have been one of those. This event may have been caused by a change in one of the quantum forces. Once a neutral atom destabilizes Nothing, set in motion a chain reaction that the largest single explosive that ever ran the place in the history of reality. Although this event was more energy released when the total energy currently contained in all matter in our universe. Some call it the “Big Bang”, I call it the “event”. (See Figure 2) This is not a singularity exploded into existence, it is a setting a nuclear chain reaction in a perfect sea of atoms. This is not only an extension of space, there is an explosion of the space. This reaction is instantaneous and it is, I think the only event currently occurring in our universe at a speed exceeding the speed of light. There are several ways to test for it. The atoms are not arranged so closely that, once the chain reaction begins, it is instantaneous. Therefore, we do not see the light that emanates from this expansion of our universe. I suggest that if we could travel fast enough and far enough into space, we finally have the gap in a wall of energy on our part. That’s what I call the “Event Horizon”, but that name is already taken, so I called the Wave Creation. “This wall of energy is the barrier between our world and universe n ‘ is not. On the other side of this wall of energy is the universe as it was before the event. be an endless sea of nothing perfect atoms in turn, wait for the next “wave of destruction created . This means that our universe as we speak, born and will continue to be born for eternity. This may also explain the observations that our universe is not slowing but accelerating as it expands outward. The device is essentially the wave drag behind him on the outside because of the continued expansion and the immense gravity of the universe or nothing on the other side of the wave of creation. Another possibility is that the more we enter the room, the youth of our universe. This means that the center of our universe, the oldest, while the outer edges of the youngest. Since the wave set up by the region of space are not so long, the outer regions appear to be accelerated. It may be that the more you get to create the wave, the material is missing from our ever greater speeds. This creation is a continuing wave of the wave of destruction from the center of the known universe at the speed are amazing. This extension allows to explain why there is so much empty space there. The universe is expanding, we know the outside to the empty space in a vacuum has never existed to fill. A world full of energy and matter in our universe of matter and energy in the anti-universe. It is likely that in a universe of antimatter has been created with the material universe in which we live today. I consider this possibility. It may be that the matter outnumbered the anti-matter in any atomic explosions of massive anti-matter interactions or shortly after the event. Finally, matter and antimatter was destroyed victory has left us a universe of matter. I have options, why we do not offer blinded by spray and by the energy released by this process. One possibility is that the mass of the universe is not infinite on the other side of the wave of creation. The light caused by the event to be folded back towards the creation of the universe is nothing but wave front. The second possibility is that the wave of creation is so far away now that the light emitted get this event can not, our region is no more room. The only evidence left in the form of cosmic background radiation. A third possibility is that the creation of the wave is so fast, at speeds faster than light, that light waves are so stretched they will not appear in our spectrum known. This incredibly long waves are far to the left, on the electromagnetic spectrum. These are not radio waves, they are super radio. The only real evidence of this event in the form of cosmic background radiation are. It is the thumbprint of the final nuclear explosion.