Ronald Barnett in his book “The Idea of Higher Education said that governance refers to institutions of higher education policy and strategic planning must be an expression of the will of the entire academic community of be. It is said that the directors and vice chancellors are in the first line in the financial interests is the essence of the transaction, and approves the use of performance indicators and systems assessment is likely to reduce the sense of community in an institution. If Barnett uses the term “community of scholars, he said a group of academics / researchers an internal culture of sharing and a set common interests. The development of this “community” in the universities can be achieved, but may be assigned by managers whose main objective is the cost of gasoline and operating system. As I reflect on the work of Barnett and statements, I realize that the participatory approach in a collaborative form of internal administration usually occurs because a principle of good administration of universities. In fact, there are benefits for the Using a participatory approach to governance in higher education. This helps create a balance between administrative and academic interests and maintains the feeling of “community” in an institution. In addition, when the faculty has the right to participate the development of policy and the Board sets the political harmony will result. What I am advocating is a process of fusion of the faculty and staff involvement, the resources of the body staff and management techniques in the management of an institution. Specifically, you need four things: first, staff, and comments on areas such as the use and allocation of resources and effective use resources, and secondly, developing a process for soliciting their views and comments, third, are the views and comments taken into account when implementing policies and decisions affecting the entire academic community, and fourthly, if a cooperative form of internal management to be truly effective, it requires the use of systems for producing a balanced assessment of management techniques with the faculty and staff to increase participation governance. This system is also estimated to determine the extent the views of the university community into account. In the world there are many problems for those who run universities. These include the need for government and research funding was received to operate effectively and to demonstrate that the facility is not in the ivory tower, but it is relevant to the needs of the local community. The need for training and experience in developing a skilled workforce, equipped to participate in the development of local and national objectives of supply is also important. Another problem is that no real university, particularly in countries development is encouraging that the resources and needs of these agencies in a position to be independent, responsible, and to produce more with less. These questions and many others, institutions can face advice on the situation financial status and basic operating focus. navigate, but the success of these questions requires a temperature control by the council, with the participation of employees issued. In other words, there is a need a cooperative form of internal management in institutions of higher education. For indeed, more wisdom and knowledge from a group of people than one person with management techniques armed.